Category Archives: English
Attending a political discussion on Iran and U.S. Policy
Honorable Tom Ridge; The First U.S. Homeland Security Secretary, former Pennsylvania Governor, and Homeland Security Advisor to President George W. Bush.
Colonel Wesley Martin (ret.), Former Senior Antiterrorism, Force Protection Officer,. Coalition Forces – Iraq, Operations Chief, Task Force 134
، ديدارى با وزير سابق امنيت ملى امريكا ، آقاى تام ريج
ديداريك له گه ل وزيرى پيشوى ئاسايشى نيشتمانى ولاته يه كگرتوه كانى ئه مريكا
اين نشست با همت آقاى رى سابو برگزار شده بود
A letter to Dr. Ahmed Shaheed, U.N Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in Iran, by two Kurdish Human Rights organizations in the United States
A letter to Dr. Ahmed Shaheed, U.N Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in Iran, by two Kurdish Human Rights organizations in the United States
July 21, 2013
Your Excellency Dr. Ahmed Shaheed,
U.N Special rapporteur for Iran to the Human Rights Council
Dear Dr. Shaheed:
Let us commend you for your latest comprehensive report on Human rights violations in Iran and your advocacy for open conversations about human rights. We share your concerns and hopes for changes in the status quo.
As you continue to work on the continuing violations of human rights in Iran, we are sure you are aware that the condition of ethnic minority groups, Kurds, in particular, is deteriorating. Violations of human rights continue as the increasing militarization of Kurdish cities and towns contributes to even more pervasive human rights abuses in violation of Article 27 of the Declaration of the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities .
These abuses as your latest report on the situation of human rights in Iran had documented, include arbitrary arrests, unfair trials, torture, and summary executions, and public hanging .
From 2009, 13 Kurdish prisoners have lost their lives in prison as a result of torture and abusive treatment. Many Kurdish prisoners of conscience remain in prison without any legal resources and recourse. Several prisoners deprived of medical care have died in custody. Kurds as a distinct ethnic minority continue to suffer from institutionalized social, religious, and cultural discrimination. They experience internal displacement, expulsions, linguistic discrimination, suppression of publications, imprisonment of journalists and imposition of heavy bails on detainees. Psychological torture and intimidation through public ridicule and humiliation is becoming the hallmark of the Islamic Republic of Iran as it was the case with dressing up a convict as a Kurdish woman, the stigmatization of Yarsan and draconian restrictions against their religious practices are the latest examples of the Islamic Republic’s flagrant violations of Kurdish human rights.
Kurdish political and human rights organizations and activists are treated and punished even more harshly. Even lawyers of Kurdish prisoners are not immune from persecution and imprisonment. Every year hundreds of the so-called Kurdish “border crosser” and couriers, many of whom young children are mercilessly killed by the Iranian patrolmen on the borders of Iran, Turkey and Iraq.
From 2010 to 2012, 320 couriers were slain and many more injured (Please see the attachment). The plight of these couriers despite documented massacres and injuries is largely ignored and rarely reported and investigated by the international community. We are working on documenting the recurring violations of human rights to report to your office for consideration and review to be included in your next report.
We are grateful that your office has begun to address some of our concerns;
we have indeed seen some positive signs by the UN to address more specifically the situation of Kurdish human rights in Iran as defined in the Declaration of the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities. We welcome this increased attention; nevertheless, these steps are inadequate and fall short of expectations as stipulated in Article 27 of the aforementioned treaty.
Kurds have no other hope and aspiration beyond these international treaties to protect them against discriminatory practices and ensure that they enjoy their fundamental freedoms and cultural and linguistic rights. In this context the United Nations has a key role to play both in the protection and promotion of the Kurdish ethnic, political, cultural and linguistic rights.
It is our hope that you continue to pay particular attention to the situation of the Kurdish human rights in the context of Kurds as a distinct ethnic and linguistic group. It is imperative that the UN visit Kurdish areas to gain a better insight into the actual condition of human rights in Kurdish areas in Iran. You would be happy to lend you our support in your difficult and yet very important mission.
Dr. Amir Sharifi
Director of Kurdish Human Rights Advocacy Group
|Dr. Azad MoradianChair of Kurdish American Committee for Human Rights and Democracy in Iran (KACDHI)
Congressman Brad Sherman met A Kurdish- American community leader and voting member of the 27th district
During a town hall meeting: Congressman Brad Sherman met A Kurdish- American community leader and voting member of the 27th district
Sunday August 28, 2011
Los Angeles, California; Mr. M. Azad Moradian, community leader and voting member of the 27th district, met with Congressman Brad Sherman to discuss two pressing issues of concern to the Kurdish-American community.
Congressman Sherman, who is a member of the US House Foreign Affairs Committee, was encouraged, through a formal letter from his Kurdish constituents, to join the Kurdish Congressional Caucus in Washington DC.
Mr. Sherman reported that he recently met with the representatives of the Kurdish Community in Washington DC and will look into joining the caucus when he returns to Capitol Hill. The Congressman also expressed that he is well aware of the concerns of the Kurds in the Middle East and is glad to see Kurdish- Americans in his district.
The second worry brought to the attention of Congressman Brad Sherman was the recent and continuous military attacks on Northern Iraq by Turkey and the Islamic Republic of Iran. Mr. Sherman expressed his regrets about these attacks, and informed Mr. Moradian that he has been one of the members of the house voting against further foreign aid to Turkey. Mr. Moradian handed a letter to the congressman urging him and his colleagues to put further pressure on Turkey to end their military offensive in the Kurdish region.
Congressman received the letter and showed interest in meeting with the Kurdish-American constituents to further discuss these matters.
The Congressman’s advisory staff were also present at this event. They were receptive and expressed sympathetic views towards the Kurdish plight.
A meeting will be scheduled to further develop the relationship between the Kurdish-American communities with Congressman Brad Sherman.
We look forward to the Congressman’s potential membership in the Kurdish Congressional Caucus.
Meeting with US Congressman Brad Sherman about Zainab Jallalian and Human Rights in Iran
Sunday, July 12, 2010
In a continuous effort to raise our outcry against Ms. Zeinab Jalalian’s execution sentence, Mr. Azad Moradian and Cklara Moradian delivered a letter to US Congressman Brad Sherman of San Fernando Valley, California, an influential member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs.
This letter urged the congressman and other members of the United States government, especially the Obama administration to publicly denounce the execution of Zeinab Jalalian and to recognize the systematic eradication of Kurdish political prisoners in Iran. The letter also urged the International community to investigate the human rights crisis in Iran through an independent body.
Mr. Brad Sherman and his staff, Director of Constituent Services, Ms. Carolina Krawiec, both received a copy of our letter.
Mr. Brad Sherman showed his concern regarding the human rights crisis in Iran and recognized the Kurds as an alley of the United States. He promised a loud voice of condemnation in regards to the case of Ms. Jalalian if Kurdish Americans believe it would beneficial.
The letter was written on behalf of concerned Kurdish-American citizens and was an apolitical request from the administration to respond to a humanitarian crisis in Iran against the Kurdish minority.
We will continue to be in contact with the office of Mr. Congressman Brad Sherman in order to build a better understanding of issues concerning Kurdish-American citizens.
My email was recently hacked, and so you may have received an email with the subject titled “tpl 5tu9 1okk” or some variation of this. I apologize for any inconvenience, I was not the one to send this email. I will delete my contacts so that this problem does not occur in the event that my email is hacked again in the future.
هاورياني خوشه ويست؛
My Personal Statement
Domestic Violence against Single and Married Women in Iranian Society
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology
The following paper, is an overview of the current statistical picture of domestic violence experienced by both single and married women within Iranian society. Although numerous independent studies on domestic violence against women and children have been conducted on small scales in Iran, they have never been widely published or utilized due to political issues. The discussion in this paper are directly derived from the only widely accredited research carried out on a massive scale, supported and funded by the Iranian government in order to tackle the issue of domestic abuse.
An Overview of Current Iranian Research and Possible Underlying Etiology
Definition: The National Coalition Against Domestic Violence begins their fact sheets with the following words: “the willful intimidation, physical assault, battery, sexual assault, and/or other abusive behavior perpetrated by an intimate partner against another. It is an epidemic affecting individuals in every community, regardless of age, economic status, race, religion, nationality or educational background.
Violence against women is often accompanied by emotionally abusive and controlling behavior, and thus is part of a systematic pattern of dominance and control. Domestic violence results in physical injury, psychological trauma, and sometimes death. The consequences of domestic violence can cross generations and truly last a lifetime.” Following this statement, the organization provides harrowing statistics about women who suffer from domestic violence nationally and the adverse effect of the children who witness this violence. For the most part, it is safe to argue, that culturally, it is not acceptable to engage in violence towards women openly. Physical assault is punishable by law and also has its social consequences of shaming; although, many liberal and democratic societies still struggle with the double standards and lack of gender equality. Those deeply rooted inequalities can account for the high numbers of domestic abuse within such societies as the United States and even European nations.
Background: In Iranian society domestic violence takes on an entirely different shape. Women are not only subject to harsh treatments by an authoritative state, which rules on every aspects of their public lives, but it also provides the arena and encourages the control of their private lives. The government does so by promoting fundamentalist ideas of women as properties of me. It does so by setting up an unequal legal system and not punishing assault even when it has resulted in severe injury or at times even death. The conversation of domestic violence then cannot be simply domestic but begins to take the shape of a systematic violence, fueled by tradition, ignited by religion, encouraged by the dominant authoritarian state, and empowered by poverty and illiteracy.
The Islamic Republic of Iran has always denied the existence of domestic abuse, violence towards women and children in the family as a sociological issue within Iranian society. Most of the violence in the family is deeply tied to the societal and governmental laws of inequality towards women. Most violence towards women even has governmental sanctions, such as flogging or imprisonment, and even in some cases death for adultery. If the regime accepted domestic abuse as a problem, it had to also address the way it enables, allows, encourages, and ignores, violence towards women.
Human rights organizations, political/humanitarian oppositional groups and advocacy groups for women were the only voices that acknowledged the existence of this widespread phenomenal in Iran and fought for changes in law and education within communities.
Due to the large percentage of women in higher education, and the Universities in Iran, in the past 15 years the numbers of Masters’ and PH.D thesis on women’s issues have been overwhelming. Universities are now even discouraging students from researching on the topic of women’s issues, due to the fact that the findings are not implemented into improvements or societal progress. The papers simply sit in libraries and collect dust, which can be very discouraging.
Up until recently, there was no official statistical data on how many women suffered from domestic violence in Iran and what shape or form it was in. The common law dictated that what happens in the house has to stay in the house. A man’s household affairs very much belongs to him and other’s can not meddle in his private issues, especially regarding how he treats his wife and children. The way to continue keeping his privacy is through the silencing of the voice of dissent: women. This policy very much resembles how the Islamic Republic deals with political unrest in Iran and International outrage. We often hear that the West should not interfere or have an opinion with the way Iran deals with its people.
The Census Bauru in Iran, which is an official government agency has never conducted a study on domestic violence and has not allowed international organizations to do so either; however, in 2004 The Women’s Center for Presidential Advisory, The Interior Ministry, and The Ministry of Higher Education decided to undertake a project in Iran’s 28 provinces, regarding domestic violence in Iran. A 32 volume study was concluded after several years. These volumes include findings regarding violence towards women and children, family issues, divorce, and marriages, remarriages, the statues and effect of education and work on violence in the capital cities of each province. Only the main cities were visited and the research was conducted based on questionnaires.
These 32 volume findings are not widely available for public viewing; however, it is available to scholars and researchers as a reference at the Center for Research in Tehran. The information has also been shared with government agencies and lawmakers in the hopes of changing family laws.
Much discussion and controversy has surrounded the study, including the bias of the researchers themselves in their findings. This massive study was led by Iran’s renowned sociologist Dr. Ghazi Tabatabaei, who is still a professor in Tehran universities. Many other well-known researchers/ scholars, sociologists, psychologists, and professionals in other areas participated and contributed in this study.
A brief summery of some of the findings:
Due to the fact that Iran is a multi ethnic/ multi cultural country and is very diverse, the findings of the study show that the results from each province differ from each other very much. The study clearly shows a correlation between violence against women and living in provinces further away from the capital; which could be explained from many angles including economically, sub-cultures of the region, dominance of religion, and lack of higher education.
The research had 9 main categories and 45 subcategories.
The 9 categories include:
1. Verbal Abuse
2. Physical Abuse
3. Emotional Abuse
4. Economical Abuse (refusing her right to have a job, restricting her opportunities, taking her income, restricting allowance, etc.)
5. Legal Abuse (a husband has a legal right in Iran to take his wife’s full rights away, by restricting her from traveling, going out of the house, etc.)
6. Educational Abuse (restricting the right to go to school)
7. Neglect (restricting food, not feeding/adequately providing for a family)
8. Sexual abuse (unwanted sexual activity within a marital relationship, including rape, forced pregnancy, forced abortions, restricting wife’s access to healthcare and birth-control, extra-marital affairs)
9. Honor killings and Murder
Based on the study 66% married women in Iran are subjected to some kind of domestic violence in the first year of their marriage, either by their husbands or by their in-laws.
All married women who were participants in this study in Iran have experienced 7.4% of the 9 categories of abuse.
5.23% of married women in the study reported having experienced near death violence or feared for their lives due to domestic violence.
8.37% of married women in the study reported having experienced severe physical abuse.
7.27% of married women in the study reported having experienced educational and career restrictions.
2.10% of married women in the study reported having experienced sexual abuse; however, this number could be severely under reported due to the taboo surrounding the topic.
From these 2.10% who reported sexual abuse, 5.2% reported having a miscarriage due to severe beatings by her husband.
52% of married women in the study reported having experienced emotional abuse.
9.63% of women in the study reported wishing their husbands would die, as a result of the abuse they have experienced.
The study shows a direct correlation between women who have a higher education and are career women and experiencing a lower level of domestic violence.
The study also shows that the higher the number of children in a family, the more likely domestic violence will occur towards the woman.
The chief of police in Iran stated that 40% of all murders in Iran happen due to domestic violence and that 50% of all women who are murdered are done so by someone in their immediate family and mostly in the very home of that woman.
More often than not, defenders of men who have killed their wives bring up that the husband was suspicious of adultery. The law is very lenient and is ready to forgive men while punishing women.
The discriminatory laws in Iran may yet claim another victim to be executed by stoning to death for the “crime” of adultery. There are 8 cases in Iran on the brink of death through stoning anytime soon and one such case is that of a woman named Kobra Najjar a victim of domestic violence, for 12 years was beaten repeatedly and forced into prostitution by her husband to support his heroin addiction.
Kobra Najjar found herself in prison when Habib, a “client” of Kobra seeing her sorry plight decided to murder her husband. Habib was sentenced to death by the Tabriz High Court for the murder together with Kobra Najjar as an accomplice.
What makes this case unusual and deranged is that it shows the disparity and unequal treatment of women under a penal system favoring men over women. Serving eight years for the murder and 100 lashes for fornication Habib was released upon paying compensation to the victims’ heirs. In contrast Kobra Najjar who has also served eight years remains in prison her fate uncertain as she faces the prospect of being stoned to death anytime for adultery. Now how sick is that, forced into prostitution but under Iranian’s Discriminatory laws against women she is guilty of adultery even though she was systematically subjected to violence to force her into submission for prostitution.
In Iran’s perverted justice system under Article 83 of the Iranian Penal Code, a married person is committing adultery when they have sexual intercourse with anyone other than their spouse. Adultery is the only crime where women is sentenced to stoning and all sexual intercourse outside of marriage is illegal that can result in flogging, or hanging for the forth offense. Now how perverted is that?
Kobra Najjar under constant beatings was forced into prostitution clearly did not have any choice or say on the matter was definitely a victim. She is seen under the cross eyed Iranian sadistic judge who obviously sees only the sexual intercourse but not the circumstance of one who was victimized. It does not matter whether she was forced through coercion and violence she is an adulterer therefore deserve to die the most painful savage medieval death by stoning.
In Iran a 13 year old girl is old enough to legally marry and considered as an adult at age 8 years and 9 months, old enough to be sentenced to stoning, flogging and hanging for adultery and fornication. Iranian gender biased law favors men where pedophiles are likely to prevail over the girls and women they victimized facing the risk of being convicted should they go to courts.
Women and girls face insurmountable obstacle in getting a divorce, forced to stay even if she was in an abusive marriage and most likely lose custody of her children above age 7 to her husband and the children’s paternal grandfather. In contrast men can marry up to 4 girls and woman and can divorce them at will. The rules of evidence make it extremely difficult for women to prove their case in court should the wife decides to file a case of domestic violence her testimony is only worth half of a man’s testimony. Rape is even more impossible if not incredulous under Iranian rules of evidence; her testimony as if half its worth of a man is not bad enough has to be corroborated by men in order to prove her claims. Under this scenario a rape victim is at the mercy of her rapist and most likely end up getting sentenced for adultery, now that is truly disgusting.
References in Farsi
جانشین معاونت ناجا:آمار قتلهاي خانوادگي در ايران روبهافزايش است -. (n.d.). In مجله زنان. Retrieved August 01, 2009, from http://www.zanan.co.ir/spip.php?article1021
وضعيت خشونت در خانواده در ايران. (n.d.). In وضعيت خشونت در خانواده در ايران. Retrieved August 1, 2009, from http://www.pezeshk.us/?p=2900
داوری, �., & سلیمی،, �. (1386). جامعهشناسی کجروی. تهران: انتشارات حوزه و دانشگاه.
خشونت مرگبار خانوادگی |. (n.d.). In انجمن جامعهشناسی ایران. Retrieved August 01, 2009, from http://www.isa.org.ir/node/1709
References in English
Afifi, T. O., Enns, M. W., Cox, B. J., Stein, M. B., Jitender, S., & Asmundson, G. J. (2008). Population attributable fractions of psychiatric disorders and suicide ideation and attempts associated with adverse childhood experiences. Population attributable fractions of psychiatric disorders and suicide ideation and attempts associated with adverse childhood experiences., 98(5), 946-952. Retrieved May 11, 2008, from PsycINFO.
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FACTS. (2007, July). In National Coalition Against Domestic Violence. Retrieved July 28, 2009, from http://www.ncadv.org
Facts & Figures on Violence Against Women – Say No to Violence against Women. (2007, November). In UNIFEM – United Nations Development Fund for Women. Retrieved July 28, 2009, from http://www.unifem.org/campaigns/vaw/facts_figures.php
Renner, L. M., & Markward, M. J. (2009). Factors Associated with Suicidal Ideation Among Women Abused in Intimate. Factors Associated with Suicidal Ideation Among Women Abused in Intimate, 79(2), 139-154. Retrieved April, 2009, from [EBSCOHost].
A Safe Place: domestic violence shelter, counseling, and help programs. (n.d.). Retrieved August 01, 2009, from http://www.asafeplaceforhelp.org
World: Violence Against Women — In Iran, Abuse Is Part Of The Culture. (n.d.). In Payvand, Iran News, Directory and Bazar. Retrieved August 01, 2009, from http://www.payvand.com/news/03/nov/1159.html
This site and all content © VOKRadio.com and the respective authors. All Rights Reserved. In other words: articles are posted on VOKRADIO with the kind permission of the authors.
The authors retain all rights to their work and articles found on this site may not be posted elsewhere without the express permission of the author.
The follwing comments are brought to this page from the Iranian.com website. To see more comments and idea pleas visit:
|Recently by Azad||Comments||Date|
|I would really like to know why my posts keep getting deleted||
|Nov 13, 2009|
|Sep 15, 2009|
|The complexities of human sexuality, and Islamic laws and regulations in Iran||
|Sep 12, 2009|
Cost of progress
by javaneh29 on Sat Sep 12, 2009 10:11 AM PDT
No one here is defending Islam. How can we. The issue is about domestic violence , unless your reading something Im not and DV is universal. That is all we are saying. And I think we agree that Islam cultivates and even advocates violence to women.
However let me ask you this : imagine if you can, that you are an Iranian woman. Choose your age, where you live, but lets say you are married to a man who beats you. Lets agree that you have 1 or more children. What would you do ? where would you go ? What protest would you make? And ask yourself this …. what would be your expectation from having made that protest/ complaint and keep it real. Then tell me that it is still easy for a woman in Iran to stand up to DV.
And btw why is it only a very small number of men in Iran defend womens rights to a life without DV? What do you do ?
Ladies You posted, but did not answer my question
by Cost-of-Progress on Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:07 AM PDT
True that violence against women is not unique to Islam or Islamic countries. That is not the point here. The point is:
Where else do we have institutionalized marriage for 9 year old females?
Where else do we punish the rape victim for the crime instead of the rapist?
Where else (other than Utah) is OK to have multiple wives?
You people need to stop defending Islam.
Is it the “72 virgins and the boys without hair” mentioned in koran that tempts you? But, you’re women for crying outloud. Then what is it?? WHAT?
We are the only nation on earth who embrace those who invaded and raped our people and culture. Sickening.
vaghan ke ajab mardomi hastim!!!
by Iraneh Azad on Fri Sep 11, 2009 04:25 AM PDT
But not surprising considering who is ruling our country today . I’m sure that some people will try to justify this behavior by Iranian men and say that this is part of our “culture”.
by MiNeum71 on Fri Sep 11, 2009 03:57 AM PDT
This is a very sad truth. I’ve written many, many times in this place stating UN-data, that the Iranian society (in and out of Iran) doesn’t respect women’s rights. This shows how uncivilized the Iranian society is.
by capt_ayhab on Thu Sep 10, 2009 01:36 PM PDT
Violence and rape against women has nothing to do with religion nor nationality.
According to National Organization for Women, 3 women are murdered every day in USA by their intimate partners.
According to the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, women experience about 4.8 million intimate partner-related physical
assaults and rapes every year.
According to the National Crime Victimization Survey, which includes crimes that were not reported to the police, 232,960 women in the U.S. were raped or sexually assaulted in 2006. That’s more than 600 women every day.
According to the same report younger women[age 20-24] and women from impoverished sectors of society are at greatest risk of violence and rape.
The blog is informative, however it fails to put into perspective the pandemic nature of violence against women in other countries and it lacks comparability.
Violence against women knows
by TheMrs on Thu Sep 10, 2009 01:20 PM PDT
Violence against women knows no boundary or religion. It is purely a matter of power. The more women are impoverished, the more they are powerless. This can happen, and does happen every where. Even the article mentions a positive correlation between higher education and lower instances of violence. And more violence as you move away from larger cities. The more socioeconomic progress women have, the more power they have. Hence, lower instances of abuse. You can bash any particular factor, such as ethnicity, religion or something else. But the fact remains the same. It is purely a question of power. Hala in our case, shansemoon be eslam khordeh. But you can’t take that and use it as a main factor here because without it, if women are powerless, you’d see the same thing.
Now we can take religious conservatism as an obstacle to women’s emancipation. That I can understand.
Cost of progress
by javaneh29 on Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:04 PM PDT
It matters not whether you agree or disagree … these are the result of psychological and socialogical studies.Im sure you’re clever enough to find those studies yourself if you dont want to take my word for it.
As for Islam being the reason for the violence in Iran, how would you explain violence in non islamic countries?
Violence to women is almost always done by men, like it or not. Islam provides the perfect breeding ground for violence in that it allows the legal means to carry it out with no disincentive or reprisal. However violence to women is universal.
by Cost-of-Progress on Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:51 AM PDT
“Women who sufer any form of violence on a regular basis inevitably suffer from fear and low self esteem and are therefore unlikely to feel able to change their situation, including denouncing the religion of thier culture, kin and kith easily.”
I do not disagree with the premise of your post! —- B U T —-
“the religion of their culture“? This is not their culture, it was forced by the sword. Just becasue it has been a long time does not make it right – or just. This religion is responsible for these atrocities and we MUST start somewhere, hence the denouncement. I have no illusions that, if at all possible, it will take generations (plural) to cleanse our country of this cancer. This is provided we even make the attempt.
Right now, most folks think of this regime as an anomaly in the wonderful world of Islam instead of the norm. No matter what comes out of the muslim world, they discount its validity buy saying that “this is not true islam” – But IT IS.
Let’s not kid oursleves ….anymore.
We know that even 1% is
by TheMrs on Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:45 AM PDT
We know that even 1% is unacceptable for these categories. But I wish the authour would put into perspective for us. For example, how do we compare to other countries in the region? Are our numbers better? If so, maybe we can figure out why and encourage those aspects that seem to be working for us. If not, then we should find out why. How do we compare with Western countries? I think the comparison would be helpful. Otherwise, 7.2% here and 3.2% they don’t do much other than document (which I understand is useful). Also, do we know if these numbers are increasing or decreasing? For raising the legal age for marriage for example. What is the legal age for marriage for countries in the region or other religious countries. Is it higher than Iran, how did they push the laws to increase the age?
Have to add
by javaneh29 on Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:26 AM PDT
These are only the reported incidents. I have no doubt that the incidence of ‘violence’ in any of the above forms can be multiplied by at least 10, if not more.
Women who sufer any form of violence on a regular basis inevitably suffer from fear and low self esteem and are therefore unlikely to feel able to change their situation, including denouncing the religion of thier culture, kin and kith easily.
None of this comes as a surprise. It also is no suprise that there is little in the way of support for these long suffering women.
Question for the female Islamist
by Cost-of-Progress on Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:41 AM PDT
“…Iranian gender biased law favors men
where pedophiles are likely to prevail over the girls and women they victimized facing the risk of being convicted should they go to courts.
Women and girls face insurmountable obstacle in getting a divorce, forced to stay even if she was in an abusive marriage and most likely lose custody of her children above age 7 to her husband and the children’s paternal grandfather. In contrast men can marry up to 4 girls and woman and can divorce them at will. ”
We have all have been aware of these sick, 7th century ass backward and respressive Islamic “laws”.
I HAVE ONE QUESTION FOR THE WOMEN WHO EMBRACE THIS CULT(SOME FREQUENT THIS WEBSITE):
What on earth compels you to defend, to belong, to agree, to subscribe to such teachings and endorsments? This is one sick, perverted cult forced upon your ancestors. You do not have to abide by these barbaric “laws” – free yourself from this arabic hell……….denounce it..
by Shepesh on Wed Nov 25, 2009 01:15 AM PST
Thank you for this article
by Shepesh on Thu Sep 10, 2009 09:24 AM PDT
It is very informative.